Federalism and the current Constitutional debate with religious freedom
POL/303
Mark Miller
LaCora Shorter
6/30/2014 The very first Amendment is all about guaranting the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. Federalism is the part of government that the power is separated between the national government and other governmental units. The division of church and states are balanced between law and religion. One of the continuing confusions in current American constitutional and conception (www.depts.washington.edu, 2014).

Confusion can be recognized from the recent presidential election, where the question stated whether a candidate should or should not be permitted to acknowledge his faith to the American public. The entitlement for separation remains a source of substantial controversy in areas of legislative acts, judicial decisions that are associated to religion and prayers in schools, the media, and public view polls (www.depts.washington.edu, 2014).
. The clause of the United States Constitution beliefs derives on the wall of separation, however, The farmers did not talked about The Court’s new federalism rulings being dedicated on Congress’s use of its computed powers to control commerce “among the states” (Article I, Sec. 8) and to shield civil rights (Amendment 14, Sec. 5).
Part of the confusion in understanding religious liberty within the context of the political, legal, and dimensions of America lies within the United States Supreme Court’s establishment and free exercise cases.  While trying to place the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment into a more creative jurisprudence the Court has reserved from the original intent of the framers of the First Amendment, but it has also renounced the original meaning of the Religion Clauses. The Court has transgressed indiscreetly and directly into the states’ domain and into the people’s province of authority by judicially amending the…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *